Search results

Gee, maybe if it ends early, Polaris can start production early, and actually get Snow Checks to buyers before December and January. :Banghead

Moved to correct board: Wedge/Evolved

Could also be approach angle or other angles from wheels that tracks go over

We used to do that except with small holes. One drawback though in snirty condition they also pack with crap and can wear faster.

From what I remember, Dalton charges a setup fee, to cut a custom Helix. Once they have done that, the angles are in their CNC and the fee no longer applies to whomever than asks for those angles?

Going back to the track. That .91 lug height even with studs will never be “grippy”

It’s not a 2 up sled

In regards to the old triples running softer belts? Could the twins torgue and power pulses every 180 degrees vs 120 degrees of a triple, have a effect on belt life? The twins pound on the belt harder?

The base Indy has a .91 tall lug Shockwave track the SP has a 1 inch lug Hacksaw track. Neither will grip like a Ripsaw or Cobra. The Indy is more of a playfull sled IMO. This might be of interest to you...

The problem withe 1.325 studs as they wear a little you loose your penetration. I use 1.575 Gold Diggers only up the middle with no issues on Axys Pro S, and Indy XC's. The XC I ran tunnel Protectors. You will get different opinions on that. On the Matryx I am running 1.500 Fastracs and you...

What is a sena 10s

Or use the old double u shaped tool Polaris used to include with XTRA 10 and forward sleds

Nothing for me yet on the new 650 or last years 850. Getting close to going to Arbor Vitae/St Germain area and just run on the lakes a little bit.

I honestly can't answer that, but I don't think the 137 track will work with the bigger drivers and wheels.. Not long enough. Doc isn't here any longer. He may be on FB.

Read from the beginning. Running a bigger driver, was done with running a longer track with shorter luggs

Something has happened at HCS, I don't understand it. There may be guys trying to comeback here that you have banned

bigger gears are more efficient, usually less dog leg in the chain, There is a trade off if you search for it.

Brock doesn't post here any longer. Special tools are needed to test springs. Here is one example.

Stock weights because Polaris 64 grams are what is best on a 600. If you are a tinker a set of heavy 64's that would be say 64.5 are worthwhile, or 66's ground down to 65 grams. But only through trial and error can you find out what works best. The OEM Polaris clutching is pretty good overall.

10-60 weights are way to light. Sled will overev and loose power. Fact. Use stock balanced weights. 10-64. 66 are ok on a REAL cold day but won't backshift as well. A 120-310 primary spring. Yes that is lighter. Keeps sled closer to powerband. A 46-42 full progressive helix and a secondary...