Search results

Were these tested on loose snow? 7.3 @ 91 are not good 660' times on hardpack. I know timers on snow are less than consistent and I'm just curious what people are seeing with the SBA. Bone stock sleds I'm assuming? I also assume the time shown was one of the "better" times? What were the...

You will need to run more primary spring with these weights. 140/330team, 160/340slp, 165/327team are all good. Bullydog is better with the BMP pipe.

I agree, those weights are a good choice. SLP has great customer service as well. Easy to adjust and only need a few springs to make them work.

When you spin with a steeper helix it causes an overshift. A shallower helix reduces the overshift and recovers much quicker. Full progressives can be very inconsistent because of this. The stock helix has a short duration of 58 and your already on the shallower 44 when it's trying to recover...

How much weight can you add? Wesbite shows 10g 60to70g. Talked to someone and he said 8g max which kinda puts mine on the edge of having to run fully loaded when using a pipe. Ordered a set of 60's thinking I could go up to 70g.

Engages at 3800. Depends on the day/conditions. Around 69. I also picked up some longer set screws so I can load the heel. They come with 1.2g short set screws only and a lock set which are .7g i believe.

Didn't just pick somones set up and say "mines faster". Just shared what i tried and said it like it is. Nothing personal. I like aggressive weight and light springs too. Very surprised by how well these worked out.

Less than 500 miles on them. 64-80g. 100cnd.

They aren't a high elevation weight. Spoke with SLP about this before buying them. I have tested these weights against a lot of stuff that has been posted on here. Run the stock helix and 140/220 secondary with 160/340 primary or something close. Mine shifts out at 8150-8200 builds to 8400...

I've always taken that approach as well. Just can't with the SLP's. The higher start and finish primary spring are needed with these weights and secondary as I posted. Can't run much helix with them either. They shift out pretty hard. You running the stock Helix with the TM's.

What springs / helix are you running with the turbo mags?

Yes, ease of adjustment is nice. Profile wise SLP's are close to 10's. I should have added all testing was on hard pack about 800' runs. Also tried some 40mph rolls. SLP's really seem to put some distance in the mid. Just thought I would share. If there's a better profile weight please...

Let us know how the TM's work out. I did A lot of sxs testing with SSI's, 10 series and SLP magnum force lately. Tried all the common springs and helix 's that work. 48/44fp, 46/42fp...... you get the point. Surprisingly the SLP magnum force with a 160/340 spring, the stock helix and...

Ok thanks. If it doesn't build pipe heat then it kinda defeats the purpose. I'm running the same PCV. It will be interesting to see what Dynojet says.

Is that with a 19-032 PCV? How much was involved to get it working?

Check that your belt isn't stuck down in your secondary. That'll make it do what you are describing. Belt change tool possibly forgotten in the clutch.?

I've been running SLP magnum force. They seem to pull very well but really don't like the low engagement plus the high finish they need which limits spring choice. Have also run SSI's which i thought worked well. Just more of a pain to adjust. Thoughts on the best adjustables out there for the...

PM sent. Thanks

Just to add to the previous post. Does anyone know if there are differences between the 16 and 17 stock mapping from Polaris. I think i remember reading that there was timing pulled on the 17. Does DTR have the map I'm looking for? My Subscription is expired right now.

Does anyone have a PC5 baseline map for a 17 SBA with just a BMP Pipe.? Fuel + Ignition. I tried BMP. They only had a 16 fuel only map. I have no interest in the bullydog at this point as i have several pipes.... Thanks in advance if anyone would like to share it.